Retool

43% of CTOs, CISOs, and CIOs are not very confident or not at all confident they have full visibility into all production internal tools.

59% of CTOs, CISOs, and CIOs cannot confirm whether their organizations have had an AI-caused production incident.

93% of CTOs, CISOs, and CIOs are concerned about vibe-coded tools running in production.

37% of CTOs, CISOs, and CIOs describe their organization's AI governance as uneven across teams.

10% of CTOs, CISOs, and CIOs describe their organization's AI governance as reactive.

8% of CTOs, CISOs, and CIOs describe their organization's AI governance as strong.

90% of CTOs, CISOs, and CIOs say business pressure to enable AI building has increased in the past 12 months.

38% of CTOs, CISOs, and CIOs call vibe-coded tools running in production a top operational risk.

19% of CTOs, CISOs, and CIOs can definitively say their organizations have not had an AI-caused production incident because of monitoring they have in place.

22% of CTOs, CISOs, and CIOs indicate their organizations have had at least one AI-caused production incident.

5% of CTOs, CISOs, and CIOs are very confident they have full visibility into all production internal tools.

Approximately 95% of CTOs, CISOs, and CIOs acknowledge at least some gaps in visibility into production internal tools.

40% of CTOs, CISOs, and CIOs describe their organization's AI governance as mostly functional but requiring significant manual effort.

52% of CTOs, CISOs, and CIOs acknowledge having gaps in visibility into production internal tools but cannot fully quantify those gaps.

31% of CTOs, CISOs, and CIOs say their organization's tolerance for friction in enabling AI building is near zero.