Report by Cyware

Cyware Survey Reveals That 92% Believe Threat Intelligence Is Critical — But Most Organizations Still Struggle to Operationalize It

14 FINDINGSPublished May 20, 2025
View Original Report →

Key Findings

45% said they didn’t know if their organization was part of an ISAC or ISAO.

Threat intelligence

Only 13% said their current automation between Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) and SecOps tools is working well.

Threat intelligence

Only 43% say AI has made a meaningful impact so far in improving threat intel sharing within their organization.

Threat intelligenceAI

92% said collaboration and information sharing are either “absolutely crucial” or “very important”.

Threat intelligence

Only 18% confirmed that their organization is part of an Information Sharing and Analysis Center (ISAC) or Organization (ISAO).

Threat intelligence

22% reported sharing threat intel information rarely or not at all.

Threat intelligence

More than half of respondents (56%) reported either significant or moderate challenges automating workflows across CTI and SecOps teams.

Threat intelligence

25% of teams share threat intel across roles daily.

Threat intelligence

Nearly 40% struggle to coordinate data across critical security tools like TIPs, SIEMs, and vulnerability management platforms.

Threat intelligence

30% of respondents were unsure if collaboration with industry peers to improve threat intel even exists.

Threat intelligence

57% of respondents said their organization collaborates with industry peers to improve threat intel.

Threat intelligence

92% of respondents believe threat intelligence is critical.

Threat intelligence

78% of respondents believe AI will improve threat intel sharing within their organization.

Threat intelligenceAI

Only 17% of teams share threat intel across roles in real time.

Threat intelligence