Report by ISC2
Rethinking AI's Impact on Cybersecurity Roles
Key Findings
63% of cybersecurity professionals who use AI spend more time reviewing or validating AI outputs.
Cybersecurity professionals experiencing increased AI-related stress spend additional time reviewing or validating AI outputs at 74%, compared with 57% for those reporting decreased stress.
53% of cybersecurity professionals believe AI is creating new entry-level opportunities.
10% of cybersecurity professionals report ambiguity in accountability when AI recommendations are incorrect.
48% of cybersecurity professionals report spending less time on tasks that do not involve AI over the past year.
62% of cybersecurity professionals do not believe AI has reduced the need for foundational cybersecurity skills, compared to 26% who say it has.
82% of cybersecurity professionals say it is very important to establish when to trust AI outputs.
48% of cybersecurity professionals say AI makes them feel more optimistic about their long-term career prospects.
61% of cybersecurity professionals list undetected errors scaling across systems as a top concern.
32% of cybersecurity professionals say AI has increased workplace stress.
80% of cybersecurity professionals say knowing when to override AI decisions is very important.
89% of cybersecurity professionals report having experienced AI recommendations that lead to incorrect outcomes at their organizations.
56% of cybersecurity professionals say AI has reduced the need for entry-level roles.
80% of cybersecurity professionals say having clear governance frameworks in place for AI is very important.
65% of cybersecurity professionals who use AI spend more time deciding when to trust or act on AI-generated recommendations.
48% of cybersecurity professionals report that AI has reduced workplace stress.
50% of cybersecurity professionals say their organizations hold human decision-makers ultimately accountable when AI-recommended actions lead to incorrect outcomes.
62% of cybersecurity professionals list over-reliance on AI as a top concern.
56% of cybersecurity professionals list reduced human judgment at critical decision points as a top concern.
8% of cybersecurity professionals report a lack of clear ownership when AI recommendations are incorrect.
21% of cybersecurity professionals say accountability varies depending on the severity of the issue when AI recommendations are incorrect.
Cybersecurity professionals experiencing increased AI-related stress spend additional time deciding when to trust AI-generated recommendations at 76%, compared with 57% for those reporting decreased stress.