Report by Salt Security

State of Agentic AI and API Security 2H 2026

11 FINDINGSPublished Oct 13, 2026
View Original Report →

Key Findings

Only 12.5% of organizations can consistently trace a complete agent path across all agents, from initial instruction through tools and APIs to outcome.

ObservabilityAIAgentic AIEnterprise IT

Only 17.5% of organizations can automatically stop an agent that begins behaving unexpectedly in production.

ContainmentOperational SecurityAIAgentic AIEnterprise IT

32.9% of organizations have found an unauthorized, shadow, or misconfigured MCP server in the past 12 months.

Infrastructure SecurityCloud SecurityMCPEnterprise IT

Only 6.8% of organizations resolve AI-generated code issues inside the coding assistant at generation time.

Secure DevelopmentDevSecOpsAI CodingEnterprise IT

49.8% of organizations confirm or suspect an AI agent took an action in the past 12 months that the organization did not intend, expect, or authorize.

AIAgentic AIEnterprise IT

86.4% of organizations report at least one AI agent operating.

AI Enterprise ITAgentic AI

59.5% of organizations run more than ten AI agents.

AIEnterprise ITAgentic AI

76.8% of organizations report agents that chain actions across other agents, tools, and APIs.

AutomationAPIsAgentic AIEnterprise IT

More than 60% of organizations would need hours or days of manual work to reconstruct what a specific agent did the previous day.

Incident ResponseAIAgentic AIEnterprise IT

54.3% of organizations have confirmed or suspected an unauthorized, shadow, or misconfigured MCP server.

Infrastructure SecurityCloud SecurityMCPEnterprise IT

83.5% of organizations estimate AI-generated or AI-assisted code contributes to at least some of their application security findings.

Application SecurityAIAI CodingEnterprise IT