Key Findings
28% of digital trust professionals point to their board or executives as having ultimate responsibility for AI.
32% of digital trust professionals believe they could halt an AI system within 60 minutes after a security incident.
36% of digital trust professionals say humans approve most AI-generated actions before execution.
26% of digital trust professionals report that humans review selected AI decisions or patterns after execution.
43% of digital trust professionals are completely or fairly confident in their organization’s ability to investigate and explain to leadership or regulators if a serious AI system incident occurred.
18% of digital trust professionals indicate that disclosure is required and enforced when AI has been used to create or substantially assist with work products.
11% of digital trust professionals say humans intervene in AI decision-making only when alerted to potential issues.
20% of digital trust professionals say disclosure of AI use is required but not consistently enforced.
32% of digital trust professionals note that no disclosure requirements exist when AI is used to create or substantially assist with work products.
18% of digital trust professionals believe their CIO or CTO would have ultimate responsibility for AI.
20% of digital trust professionals say they do not know how humans oversee AI decision-making at their organization.
39% of digital trust professionals are completely or fairly confident in their organization’s data governance around AI.
56% of digital trust professionals indicate they do not know how quickly they could halt an AI system due to a security incident if needed.
7% of digital trust professionals say it would take them more than 60 minutes to halt an AI system after a security incident.
13% of digital trust professionals assign ultimate AI responsibility to their CISO.
20% of digital trust professionals do not know where ultimate responsibility for AI would lie in their organization.